May the Force Be With Us...Avoiding "Air Wars" in Asia Pacific

Greetings, Cafe Patrons.

Over the past several weeks, I've been reading with interest the increasingly noisy debate going on primarily in the North American market pitting airlines vs. GDS's vs. corporate buyers vs. TMC's vs. travel technology companies vs....wait a second, I thought wars were usually between two sides??

Perhaps likening this debate to a war is a bit of a stretch, but certainly the passions that are being flamed over distribution of emerging airline and hotel pricing models are quite toasty, to say the least. At the core of these arguments lie the surging revenues airlines are generating through the unbundling of their airfares and charging as ancillary fees all things great and small during the flight. The corporate travel industry in particular is heavily affected by these types of charges as it's pretty well universally accepted that no one has quite figured out how to book, track, manage, report and account for that $9 ham-and-cheese sandwich on board or that $7.50 pillow purchase (and if the company reimburses for the pillow, does it become company property?)

Earlier this year, the debate was taken to a very public, and entirely new level, via a pair of blog postings from US industry veterans Jim Davidson of Farelogix, and Kevin Mitchell of the Business Travel Coalition. These online salvos were then followed up by what I hear was quite the entertaining session at last month's NBTA conference in Houston. If anyone in the Cafe happened to attend that session, the Barista would love to hear more about it! For the rest of our Cafe goers, if you're up for some fairly fiesty reading, follow these links in order:

Farelogix vs. BTC: http://www.tnooz.com/2010/04/08/news/fear-and-loathing-in-the-airline-industry-innovation-on-hold/

BTC retort: http://www.tnooz.com/2010/04/09/news/set-phasers-to-stun-davidson-accused-of-warped-logix-about-airline-industry/

And just this week, a group of fed up industry types (of which Kevin Mitchell's BTC is a backer) have launched what seems to be another attempt to sway public opinion on the subject, albeit with a fairly silly YouTube video of someone's grandmother reading a prepared statement off a cue card. Again, if you're up for an amusing look at this topic, check out www.madashellabouthiddenfees.com

Anyway, while all of this lively banter is going on in the North American market, it begs the question: when will it hit us here in Asia Pacific? If the level of intensity around the debate within our industry overseas is any indication, we'd better pay close attention to ensure "peace" rather than bringing out the lightsabers. That way, we hopefully can learn from this debate for our region and how we can implement steps to pro-actively manage the situation rather than let it digress into a war of words.

What particularly concerns me about this situation for the Asia Pacific region is that content fragmentation is such a way of life here that any attempts to normalise things in the past have, well, not become the norm. Depending on what you classify as a CRS/GDS, there are more than 10 distribution systems in Asia within the travel industry, and that doesn't even count the proliferation of websites and online travel agencies offering content to travellers.

Adding to the mix, and which is reminiscent of what's happened in the North American market, is the rapid entrenchment of low-cost carriers across Asia Pacific offering their own version of direct selling to both consumers and business travellers alike. Oh, and don't forget that those same LCC's are also offering unbundled, pay-for-what-you-use services for a separate fee. So the battle lines may still be fuzzy, but they are certainly being drawn.

Now I'm not going for a "Travel Distribution Nobel Peace Prize" but I do have some suggestions for us as a regional industry to consider to try and avoid a repeat of the vitriol in other markets:

1. "Legal Collusion:" there are laws and very good reasons why airlines, GDS's or TMC's can't sit at the same table to discuss these things, but there's nothing against an airline, a GDS, a TMC and their corporate customers ALL SITTING DOWN TOGETHER to discuss these issues. All the dialogue from the US laments the fact that of all the stakeholders in this business, no one has sat down together to try and work this out. The first step to getting to an agreement is agreeing that no one has agreed on anything. So let's agree to sit down and discuss our disagreements, then work to agree on how to avoid future disagreements. Agreed?

2. Corporate Buyers Define What They Really, Really Want: what are the truly big issues with respect to fees: booking? Reporting? Policy? All of the above? More than the above? If buyers aren't clear about what their challenges are, then it just seems as though they're mad because no one asked them whether they wanted these fees in the first place (see suggestion 1 above!) One group that's not precluded from getting together and collating their grievances about travel-related issues are corporate buyers, so it's time to rally those troops and put together a prioritised list of issues and proposed recommendations from the ones who really bear the brunt of these fees.

3. Remove the Protectionist Attitudes: let's face it, we operate in a fiercely competitive industry, so we certainly can't begrudge anyone trying to make money here, be it airlines, GDS's, technology companies, etc. However, we must come to an understanding that at the end of the day we all have similar interests around efficiency, cost savings, and ease of use for those who want to buy travel services so if it's possible to be altruistic in our industry, this would be a reason to do so.

On that last point, perhaps I'm being naive as the massive growth projected for the Asia Pacific region in the coming decade is certainly ripe for certain entities doing all they can to grab as much advantage as possible over their competitors. That being said, time and again in the travel industry I find that suppliers and technology companies end up going down a certain road for several years, only to hit a wall and have to re-think their strategy. How about we avoid the wall altogether?

In any case, it may just require the Death Star to be blown up by the Rebel Alliance before anyone pays attention to this looming issue out here in Asia Pacific (are we the far far away galaxy perhaps?) Just don't ask me to comment on who I think Darth Vader is in all this...

Image courtesy www.sodahead.com

Same, Same...but Different?

Greetings, Cafe Patrons.

For those of you who have been to Thailand, Cambodia or other parts of SE Asia, you may be familiar with the theme of this week's Cafe. Whether it's a fake Rolex or a hotel room that's not quite as nice as you thought it was on the Internet, you'll hear a common reply from the locals: "yes, it's same same...but different!"

Which is what was running through my mind at last week's Association of Corporate Travel Executives' Asia Pacific Conference in Singapore. And no, it wasn't because someone was trying to sell me a "Louie Veeton" handbag for my wife ("no really honey, it's a real one...same same but different...!")

As I was sat at a roundtable listening to an industry perspective presentation, one of the attendees whispered to his tablemate that "we've heard this all before, has nothing changed in our industry? It's the same thing every year." And that's when it hit me - yes it's "same same" - but quite different than it may seem on the surface.

Take content fragmentation, GDS relevance and online adoption in Asia Pacific, for example. Five years ago when I attended my first ACTE Asia Pacific conference, I was working for a GDS company and was part of a session discussing the demise of traditional distribution due to the "imminent rise of online booking and direct connects in the region." Lots of nodding heads in the audience at that one.

At the conference last week, we heard from several TMC's including HRG and BCD that online booking adoption is growing in Asia Pacific and that supplier content fragmentation continues to be the norm in this region. So there you go - on the surface it sounds like we were saying what was said five years earlier ("same same!")

But listen closer, and you'll start to hear the "but different" part of the old saying. During another industry perspective presentation at ACTE, BCD's Greg O'Neil in particular talked about this subject within a comprehensive white paper called "At The Tipping Point" in which he rightly points out that while online booking has grown significantly in the region (the "same same" part) the BCD white paper also notes that "...a further trend toward the increased use by business travelers of smart phones and other Web—enabled devices should be seen as an interlinked development with online booking." That's the "but different" part.

The great fun of being in this region is that while on the surface sometimes things seem to move quite slowly, the undercurrent is whipping along at a break-neck pace. So while some people may see things as not progressing all that fast, others realise that when you reach the back-end of a period of time in this region you can expect things to suddenly look very, very different.

Many of the GDS pros, TMC leaders and buyers I spoke with last week to various degrees all understand that a big shift is already underway in Asia with respect to travel technology, distribution and traveller behaviour. And that shift is that mobile and hand-held devices are going to drive tremendous growth in self-service in Asia Pacific that will likely put this region well ahead of the rest of the world in this space in the coming months. Note I said months - not years.

Yes, given the plethora of GDS options (TOPAS or TravelSky, anyone?) seemingly endless new online upstarts (excellent IPO, MakeMyTrip) and rapid rise of mobile social media (60% of all tweets globally come from Asia - yowza!) this market may seem to be a madhouse sometimes. But from madness often comes greatness, and it's likely that the corporate travel industry will meet again in Singapore next year and look back on what will likely have been quite a year for travel technology in the region.

And that, my tablemates at ACTE, is very, very different than what you may think it is.

EXTRA SHOT FOR THE DAY

At the risk of taking credit for something I know I had no direct influence on, I still am pleased to know that Virgin Blue is at least thinking the same way I am.

In an earlier Cafe posting I offered up several ideas which DJ could take on board to help them in their attempts to steal corporate market share away from Qantas. This week they've announced that at least one of my points - widebody planes on domestic routes - will become a reality from May 2011 when they introduce A330 aircraft on routes between Perth and the east coast. Flying to Australia's largest state on a large aircraft is just natural, as why wouldn't you want to start stretching out as soon as you possibly can?

And just in case, by some miracle there are Virgin Blue patrons starting to have a peek in the Cafe's windows, I might suggest that they next see about what they're going to do with that useless "Premium Economy" class....

Image courtesy AustralianGamer.com

The World is Flat

Let's face it - when it comes to travelling on business, it's all about flying IN business.

And when flying in business, Flat rules the world.

If you're lucky enough to be working for a company that still values your time, sanity and overall well-being, then hopefully you're still flying business class and having a good chance of getting some rest on a long flight.

But if you're dealing with a company that thinks that travel is a perk or a necessary evil of doing business, then you may just have to resign yourself to sitting in misery at the back of the bus.

Unless...dare I say it...you're willing to fly a Low Cost Carrier?

Air Asia announced this week that they're now offering flat bed seats in their "premium" section, which will be rolling out on many routes in the coming months. Melbourne to Kuala Lumpur is already showing availability of the lie-flat seats, with some pretty incredible fares. A return fare for later this month came up at only AU$1454 whereas a quick search on Webjet to compare other carriers found the cheapest business class fare was on Emirates and at nearly double the price of Air Asia. A search of Economy fares showed on average about a $400-500 difference. Not altogether a large amount if you need to step right off a flight into a meeting.

Which will all make for interesting debates in corporations who've reacted to the GFC by slashing travel costs at any cost, and traveller comfort and productivity be damned. However many companies will then ask their travel buyers to still negotiate with the same carriers to get better Economy or Premium Economy fares rather than business class. And travellers will likely start revolting if they see they can get a lie-flat seat on a Low-Cost Carrier at a price relatively similar to the Economy Class fare their company likely negotiated with a mainline carrier.

This could be bad news for travel managers trying to maintain a program whilst having unhappy travellers relegated out of premium products. And to make matters worse, the route coverage Air Asia is touting is a pretty good lineup of regional Asia Pacific business destinations: Melbourne, Gold Coast (well, at least for meetings anyway) Perth, Taipei, Kuala Lumpur, Hangzhou, Tianjin, Chengdu, Mumbai and New Delhi. And if you're willing to buy two separate tickets from Melbourne to London-Stansted, you can do that too as KUL-STN will be serviced by the flat beds as well.

So, business travellers may be sleeping better, but perhaps not so much travel managers trying to make sense of all this.