Global Corporate Travel Consolidation: Join In the Blogalogue!

Greetings, Cafe Patrons.

Believe it or not, I’ve just turned 8-months old as Barista of the Friday Morning Cafe. I’m not quite sure how blog years translate into people years, but I hope I’m about ready to start university perhaps?

In any case, I thought that given some increasing traffic (thanks everyone!) and a readiness to tackle some more weighty topics in the coming months, it was time to move the Cafe on from V1.0 and kick things up a bit. Next week I’ll debut a brand new look for the Cafe - an advance thanks to Mrs. Barista for most of the re-decorating – she’s a wizard!

To get things rolling for the new and improved Cafe, this week is part one of what I hope will be a provocative and interesting “blogalogue” (def. – a dialogue conducted within a blog) between the Cafe regulars and soon-to-be-regulars. Without giving too much away, I know that some of you visit the Cafe from travel management companies, some are from GDS or technology companies, some are corporate buyers, and many are corporate or leisure travellers in their own right. Given the one-to-many nature of blogs, it is often hard to get people actually “talking” about some of the topics in a structured way.

In the new Cafe, I propose to change this up a bit. Here’s how: over the coming weeks, I will be reaching out to a few of you who are regulars and some who may not yet be regulars, to see if we can’t get the comments section rolling (that’s the “blogalogue” part) around a particular topic. And if my own web surfing experience is any indication, it will have to be a pretty interesting topic to get people to join in the discussion on line.

So here goes.

As the world’s economy tries to put the recent GFC behind it, I believe that the differences at which recovery is progressing across various global markets is significant. On the one hand you have emerging and/or expanding markets like the BRIC and South East Asian countries that have basically already forgotten about GFC, while the US and European markets remain sluggish and uncertain.

From a corporate travel perspective, this patchy recovery could pose a very interesting dynamic in the coming years as many corporate travel program heavyweights traditionally are centred in the US/Western European markets. This centralised approach to travel management in those organisations have, over the past decade in conjunction with mega-TMC’s, often sought a “one global TMC, one global policy, one global program” approach to consolidation.

Given the last 2.5 years of GFC turmoil, one might then think that continued consolidation would be the norm given the relentless pursuit of cost-cutting many companies have embarked on.

However, given the aforementioned growth of certain “non-traditional” economies, there may be a counter-trend which could find more purchasing power emerging from Asia, South America or Eastern Europe than previously thought. As these markets are now powering much of the growth for many companies, these new “darling regions” could wield much more influence over how they operate. And given that many of the emerging global powerhouse companies are actually based in these rapidly growing markets, we could see an entirely new travel purchasing dynamic emerge.

So – the blogalogue question for Cafe goers is this: will consolidation of corporate travel programs continue apace, or will a new, fragmented yet regional-centric approach start to take shape?

I have a view on this, but in order to get the blogalogue going I’ll allow it to come out in response to the arguments posted by Cafe Patrons in the Comments section – see the link just below this posting. Again, I’ll be offering extra “shots” of advice to those of you I’ll be reaching out to over the coming week to galvanise the discussion – and by all means please feel free to bring newcomers to the Cafe, as again next week we will have a fresh new look ready to welcome them all!

Look forward to chatting with everyone.

Rejected!

Good Morning, Cafe Patrons.

I am serving up a special, extra strong shot of travel caffeine today, as I think we all need something potent to help clear our minds of what has been a truly befuddling week in the Australian air travel industry.

Virgin Blue was left hanging at both the US and Australian altars with two of their brides-to-be - Delta and Air New Zealand - as the US Department of Transportation rejected their proposed tie-up with Delta, and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission did the same with their Air New Zealand proposal. In both rejections, the hypocrisy seems quite evident as not only has the US DOT has approved a similar (but much larger) British Airways / American Airlines trans-Atlantic partnership but the ACCC in Australia actually approved the Virgin / Delta deal last year.

Ironically, on the very same day the US DOT rejected the Virgin / Delta marriage another Australian Government entity, the International Air Services Commission, approved a continuation of what now amounts to a duopoly on the Australia-South Africa route by extending the codeshare agreement between Qantas and South African Airways. This duopoly is thanks to V Australia (owned by Virgin Blue) recently pulling out of the AUS-SA route, leaving those two aforementioned code share partners the only direct services between the two countries.

Both regulatory bodies cited various anti-consumer sentiments in denying the partnerships, but in my mind (both as a corporate and consumer purchaser of travel) I certainly don't think either body was representing my interests. Why isn't the ACCC weighing in on the South African/Qantas code share for instance, instead leaving it to some other governmental body to ascertain the impact on the consumer? Isn't the 2nd "C" in ACCC all about the consumer?

Perhaps Virgin and Delta should hire the lobbyists that BA and AA used when petitioning the US DOT on their alliance across the Atlantic, as they obviously spun their message correctly whereas Virgin and Delta seemingly did not. Regardless, I can't fathom how the DOT could justify BA/AA getting in bed together but have decided with Virgin and Delta to, um, keep things virginal apparently.

Same for the ACCC here. They claimed that a Virgin and Air NZ partnership "...would lessen competition and increase the likelihood of ‘‘coordinated conduct’’ on the trans-Tasman route." Apparently the US DOT doesn't think the same logic applies over there, as I'm sure there will be a fair bit of "coordinated conduct" between the Brits at Waterside and the Yanks at DFW.

And just to add more insult to injury, Qantas has now stated publicly that they have a beef with Virgin's proposed partnership with Etihad. Let's not even bother with discussing the merits of airlines objecting to other airlines' plans, shall we? Of course Qantas now has issues with Virgin's plans, but does anyone have any issues with Qantas' codeshares through to Europe with BA/CX, etc? Sorry, I just said I wasn't going to go there...!

Now, I'm not advocating that all governmental bodies charged with consumer protection around the world should operate under the same guidelines when it comes to regulating things like air travel. However, I would hope that they would operate with at least the same logic. And I for one find all these rulings illogical. After all, if there is any industry on this planet that is excellent at trying new ways to fill a void in a particular part of the market, it's the airline industry (see: Southwest, Ryanair, AirAsia...and yes, even Virgin Blue circa 2001.)

If Virgin and Air New Zealand do link up and decide to start doing anti-consumerish type things like charging $1500 one-way across the Tasman, I'm sure Qantas, Tiger, Emirates or any number of future upstarts will be ready to step in and bring that consumer back with lower prices or better service or whatever will woo the customer. So why do we need endless bureaucracy combined with a lack of common sense dictating the market?

Perhaps one day I will be paying $1500 one-way across the Tasman, standing up for the entire flight, and paying a fiver to use the toilet thanks to "coordinated conduct." And if that day happens, Cafe Patrons, I may have to charge extra for that lid on your morning cuppa...

EXTRA SHOT FOR THE DAY

I'll be in Hong Kong all next week through Friday, and thanks to a jam-packed schedule and some "renovations" I'll be doing on the Cafe, we'll be closed next Friday, September 25th. I'll be back open on October 1st with a whole new look - come check it out!

Image courtesy www.commons.wikimedia.org

May the Force Be With Us...Avoiding "Air Wars" in Asia Pacific

Greetings, Cafe Patrons.

Over the past several weeks, I've been reading with interest the increasingly noisy debate going on primarily in the North American market pitting airlines vs. GDS's vs. corporate buyers vs. TMC's vs. travel technology companies vs....wait a second, I thought wars were usually between two sides??

Perhaps likening this debate to a war is a bit of a stretch, but certainly the passions that are being flamed over distribution of emerging airline and hotel pricing models are quite toasty, to say the least. At the core of these arguments lie the surging revenues airlines are generating through the unbundling of their airfares and charging as ancillary fees all things great and small during the flight. The corporate travel industry in particular is heavily affected by these types of charges as it's pretty well universally accepted that no one has quite figured out how to book, track, manage, report and account for that $9 ham-and-cheese sandwich on board or that $7.50 pillow purchase (and if the company reimburses for the pillow, does it become company property?)

Earlier this year, the debate was taken to a very public, and entirely new level, via a pair of blog postings from US industry veterans Jim Davidson of Farelogix, and Kevin Mitchell of the Business Travel Coalition. These online salvos were then followed up by what I hear was quite the entertaining session at last month's NBTA conference in Houston. If anyone in the Cafe happened to attend that session, the Barista would love to hear more about it! For the rest of our Cafe goers, if you're up for some fairly fiesty reading, follow these links in order:

Farelogix vs. BTC: http://www.tnooz.com/2010/04/08/news/fear-and-loathing-in-the-airline-industry-innovation-on-hold/

BTC retort: http://www.tnooz.com/2010/04/09/news/set-phasers-to-stun-davidson-accused-of-warped-logix-about-airline-industry/

And just this week, a group of fed up industry types (of which Kevin Mitchell's BTC is a backer) have launched what seems to be another attempt to sway public opinion on the subject, albeit with a fairly silly YouTube video of someone's grandmother reading a prepared statement off a cue card. Again, if you're up for an amusing look at this topic, check out www.madashellabouthiddenfees.com

Anyway, while all of this lively banter is going on in the North American market, it begs the question: when will it hit us here in Asia Pacific? If the level of intensity around the debate within our industry overseas is any indication, we'd better pay close attention to ensure "peace" rather than bringing out the lightsabers. That way, we hopefully can learn from this debate for our region and how we can implement steps to pro-actively manage the situation rather than let it digress into a war of words.

What particularly concerns me about this situation for the Asia Pacific region is that content fragmentation is such a way of life here that any attempts to normalise things in the past have, well, not become the norm. Depending on what you classify as a CRS/GDS, there are more than 10 distribution systems in Asia within the travel industry, and that doesn't even count the proliferation of websites and online travel agencies offering content to travellers.

Adding to the mix, and which is reminiscent of what's happened in the North American market, is the rapid entrenchment of low-cost carriers across Asia Pacific offering their own version of direct selling to both consumers and business travellers alike. Oh, and don't forget that those same LCC's are also offering unbundled, pay-for-what-you-use services for a separate fee. So the battle lines may still be fuzzy, but they are certainly being drawn.

Now I'm not going for a "Travel Distribution Nobel Peace Prize" but I do have some suggestions for us as a regional industry to consider to try and avoid a repeat of the vitriol in other markets:

1. "Legal Collusion:" there are laws and very good reasons why airlines, GDS's or TMC's can't sit at the same table to discuss these things, but there's nothing against an airline, a GDS, a TMC and their corporate customers ALL SITTING DOWN TOGETHER to discuss these issues. All the dialogue from the US laments the fact that of all the stakeholders in this business, no one has sat down together to try and work this out. The first step to getting to an agreement is agreeing that no one has agreed on anything. So let's agree to sit down and discuss our disagreements, then work to agree on how to avoid future disagreements. Agreed?

2. Corporate Buyers Define What They Really, Really Want: what are the truly big issues with respect to fees: booking? Reporting? Policy? All of the above? More than the above? If buyers aren't clear about what their challenges are, then it just seems as though they're mad because no one asked them whether they wanted these fees in the first place (see suggestion 1 above!) One group that's not precluded from getting together and collating their grievances about travel-related issues are corporate buyers, so it's time to rally those troops and put together a prioritised list of issues and proposed recommendations from the ones who really bear the brunt of these fees.

3. Remove the Protectionist Attitudes: let's face it, we operate in a fiercely competitive industry, so we certainly can't begrudge anyone trying to make money here, be it airlines, GDS's, technology companies, etc. However, we must come to an understanding that at the end of the day we all have similar interests around efficiency, cost savings, and ease of use for those who want to buy travel services so if it's possible to be altruistic in our industry, this would be a reason to do so.

On that last point, perhaps I'm being naive as the massive growth projected for the Asia Pacific region in the coming decade is certainly ripe for certain entities doing all they can to grab as much advantage as possible over their competitors. That being said, time and again in the travel industry I find that suppliers and technology companies end up going down a certain road for several years, only to hit a wall and have to re-think their strategy. How about we avoid the wall altogether?

In any case, it may just require the Death Star to be blown up by the Rebel Alliance before anyone pays attention to this looming issue out here in Asia Pacific (are we the far far away galaxy perhaps?) Just don't ask me to comment on who I think Darth Vader is in all this...

Image courtesy www.sodahead.com